The Trump administration has faced intense backlash following a report by The Atlantic revealing top officials utilizing encrypted messaging app Signal to strategize a proposed airstrike on Yemen’s Houthi rebels. The leaked message has sparked national and international controversy, igniting serious security and military decision-making at the highest levels.
How the Leak Happened
According to The Atlantic, high-level administration officials including Vice President J.D. Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz were mentioned in a confidential Signal group about the operation. The messages supposedly covered crucial specifics such as timing, aircraft selection, and success of previous strikes.
In a bizarre twist of fate, The Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally included in the group chat—allegedly by National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s error. The accidental inclusion led to the release of sensitive information about the strike.
Read More: AI job application making future employees unskilled
What the Leaked Messages Revealed
One of the most damning exposures came in the form of a message from Secretary Hegseth on March 15:
“The weather is nice. We’ve just heard word from CENTCOM that the mission is proceeding. Drone strikes at 14:15.” That is to say that the attack had been decided upon and taken at that specific moment. Additional messages from Waltz were also reported to have provided intelligence feedback, such as target information within the capital of Yemen, Sana’a. The American attack, based on reports by Houthi sources, claimed the lives of at least 53 men, women, and children. The attack was subsequently condemned by human rights activists who called for accountability.
Political Fallout and Senate Investigation
Following the leak, the Senate Intelligence Committee initiated an investigation. Democrats opined that the disclosure of such messages posed a huge national security threat since sensitive government operations are revealed. Some went so far as to call for Waltz and Hegseth to resign.
President Trump has, however, dismissed the scandal, stating that there was no leaked classified information. Hegseth supported this in a social media update on the platform X:
“The Atlantic purports to have ‘war plans,’ but no names, no specific targets, no unit designations, no classified sources. That wasn’t classified.”
He further ridiculed Jeffrey Goldberg as:
“This proves he never did read a real war plan in his life. He’s just making unsubstantiated claims.”
Meanwhile, Trump’s communications director, Caroline Levitt, acknowledged Waltz’s mistake but reaffirmed the president’s trust in his national security staff and labeled The Atlantic’s story “fraudulent.”
What’s Next?
The leaked conversation only fueled political disputes. Republicans insist that the incident is being exaggerated beyond its proportion, while Democrats are considering it a flagrant national security violation. The outcome of the Senate hearings and further questions will be the story of this scandal.
Beyond Washington, the event would have far-reaching implications for American Middle East foreign policy, potentially shaping America’s strategy in the military sphere.
